Post News ($)     Upload Images»
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» Help Center» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

Is Four Years Enough?

Posted Sep 18, 2008 by Paul Bright in Politics 3 comments
Advertising
Patriotism and sense of duty is becoming a part of this country's upcoming election. Each party's candidates and supporters have differing opinions on what is patriotism. Both agree that serving your country in the military is one of the ultimate acts of patriotism that can be made. In fact, when supporters of Barack Obama downplayed McCain's military service, he was quick to correct them and vehemently advised against McCain's military record.
Yet McCain feels that serving four years is not enough to reap the full rewards of the upcoming re-vamped G.I. Bill. He believes that it needed to be re-done, but voted against it because of retention issues.
"The most important difference between our two approaches is that Senator Webb offers veterans who served one enlistment the same benefits as those offered veterans who have re-enlisted several times. Our bill has a sliding scale that offers generous benefits to all veterans, but increases those benefits according to the veteran's length of service. I think it is important to do that because, otherwise, we will encourage more people to leave the military after they have completed one enlistment."


But wouldn't you think serving four years, regardless of which service and job, is enough to get full benefits? After all, servicemen who swear in know that at any place and any time you can be deployed. Even the Air Force, once affectionately called the "Chair Force", has service members going out of their career field to arm up and march right alongside with the Army and Marine Corps. Looking back, I can't name one time in the last 60 years when the American Military was at peace for more than six months. One day, you could be sweeping the barracks floor. 24 hours later, you could be ducking for cover.

On the other hand, serving multiple enlistments is another way to honor a veteran and reward patriotism. It takes a lot to enlist and basically make no money versus the private sector's paying rate. Just ask the E-1 computer hardware installer who is taking in a whole $1,400 per month- maybe $3,000 if you factor in chow hall, medical coverage and basically a one-bedroom apartment- versus the same guy on the outside starting at $50,000+. Except the one-striper is doing it while being shot at by the Taliban. Reenlisting either means he's crazy or is really proud of what he does for his country. Maybe there should be additional benefits.

So I pose the question: is four years enough to reap full benefits of the New G.I. Bill, or should there be additional service? DJers, please respond. I've already read one interesting comment by a DJ'er in another article concerning this G.I. Bill. We were discussing McCain's rejection of the new bill and the DJer said:
is FOUR yeras sufficient time to receive as amny benefits as thoise who serve longer periods for the safety of the country?/ Or is joyning the services in peace time just to get a set of benefits anotyer form of universal welfare that seems to be the trend being eloquently but more and more visible by the Obama rethoric learned at the altar of Saul alinsky and jeremiah in order to get PAID VOTERS... Does the sense of Duty/Patriotism factor in at all??



blog:1093:6::0
Comments (3) Subscribe To This Thread
  • avatar Posted Sep 18, 2008 by Gar Swaffar
    #1
    If they leave the "full" benefits pretty much as now conferred it's OK with me to add bennies for the folks who serve longer.
    I got my ten years of the GI Bill, the same as the guys who served twenty or thirty years or thirty five even.
    I don't have a problem with a sliding scale for additional "stuff"
  • avatar Posted Sep 18, 2008 by Paul Bright
    #2
    I served 10 years and the new bill is going to be very helpful and more realistic for today's society.
  • avatar Posted Sep 19, 2008 by Telpaman
    #3
    I haven't served one year, but have 5 older brothers that have served an average of ten years in all the armed forces and they tell me that they love this country so much and want to protect her from ALL enemies foreign and domestic (William Ayers) that 3 of them served repeatedly and loved every minute of them, I am proud of our forces and our President.
    This is no pipe-dream folks, this is America and we need to protect it all costs, even to those Liberals that disagree.
    Wake up America and help me get on the wagon to Stop Obama and Biden now! Yes, serving your country should NOT have a limit or a minimum it should be up to the individual and their family situation and it's effect and or affect to the Countries current role and standing amongst the table of freedom and it's true well being!

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment
Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?