The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageSpecialist: Safe Farming Practices May Stop Tainted-Food Incidents

Posted Jul 6, 2008 by  Bob Ewing in Food | 5 comments | 316 views
Next in Food
Related News
Advertising
As the recent salmonella outbreak linked to raw tomatoes fades from the nation's headlines, supermarket produce managers are still grasping for ways to ensure that the fresh fruits and vegetables they sell are safe.
The recent salmonella outbreaks are affecting more than the growers' incomes. Supermarkets are also feeling the results. Supermarket produce managers are still lookin for ways to ensure that the fresh fruits and vegetables they sell are safe.

A food-safety specialist in Penn State's College of Agricultural Sciences says farmers have a role to play in reducing the risk of contamination.

Luke LaBorde is an associate professor of food science and he says that growing safe spinach, onions, tomatoes or other produce is a quality-control issue, and farms that adhere to a series of federally developed recommendations are less likely to become involved in an outbreak of food borne illness.

"Microbial contamination of fresh produce can happen anywhere," LaBorde says. "Although there are no government-mandated food-safety regulations for farms, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has a list of recommendations - the 'Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables' - that offer techniques for preventing on-farm produce contamination."

The techniques are known as good agricultural practices," (GAPs). GAPS are designed to prevent contamination of produce on the farm through personal sanitation, correct use of manures and compost, proper bathroom facilities and monitoring of other areas where contamination can occur.

"Farmers who adhere to these practices are using proven food-safety control measures to prevent crop contamination," LaBorde explains. "There are no laws that require growers to use GAPs, but grocery stores, restaurants and fresh-cut processors who want to protect themselves from liability are demanding that suppliers demonstrate that they are using GAPs."

GAP guidelines present growers with proven practices and standards in health and hygiene, water quality, soil supplements and environmental hazards. To provide grocery stores and restaurants with evidence that they are following scientifically supported practices, growers typically must submit to an inspection from an independent third party auditor at some point during the harvest season.

The Fresh Produce Audit Verification program, which is a new U.S. Department of Agriculture service, is available through funding support from the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture.

Penn State Cooperative Extension and the Department of Food Science, also, are developing a GAPs educational program to help growers understand farm food-safety risks and develop a food-safety plan.

Visitors to Penn State's GAPs Web site can get background information on the audit process, forms for conducting a self-inspection, templates for writing their safety plan and instructions on how to arrange for a third-party audit.

"One day, we'll see more implementation of GAPs and farm inspectors and consumers will have a way to identify the inspected farms -- perhaps a placard or label at the grocery store," LaBorde says. "But, right now, the burden is on the consumer to ask the right questions. You can ask the produce grower at a roadside stand or farmers' market or the produce manager in a grocery store if GAPs were used. If they don't know, you can decide whether the risk is acceptable to you."

"We don't hear about the 99.99 percent of the produce that's perfectly safe," LaBorde says. "When we have tainted products shipped in from different places in this or other countries, we hear a lot about it. It's a small amount, but the implications are devastating not only for the economic viability of the industry but also to the people who get sick."
article:257041:10::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Jul 6, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #1
    It's a start.
  • avatar Posted Jul 6, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #2
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    It's a start.
    it increases the odds that when the food leaves the farm it is safe.
  • avatar Posted Jul 6, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #3
    Anything is better than nothing. Good article
  • avatar Posted Jul 6, 2008 by  Paul Wallis (Wanderlaugh)
    #4
    Humans are a pretty good way of shifting diseases around, too, particularly with bad storage practices.

    I notice that so far nobody's mentioned that tomatoes are an unusual source of salmonella. They're more likely to carry fungi than microbes. My guess would be that the GAPs will have to include storage. Anything organic can become a disease culture in the right conditions.
  • avatar Posted Jul 7, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #5
    Anything organic can become a disease culture in the right conditions.
    a vital point.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?