The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageOpinion: The Denver Democratic National Convention, a Logistical Nightmare in the Making

Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi in Politics | 35 comments | 1020 views
Next in Politics
Related News
Advertising
How do you take a scheduled event and turn it into a fiasco before it even gets started? Perhaps the Democratic Party should write a "How-To" book on convention planning so that others can learn what NOT to do to attract donations and vendors.
The clock is ticking on the Democrats in bringing together final arrangements for the national convention in Denver. There are less than two months left for them to finalize planning and coordinate things, and yet they are facing dire straits in their efforts, despite their best intentions to the contrary.

The road to hell truly does seem to be paved with good intentions.

Despite the successful fund raising by their presumptive nominee, Barack Obama, the DNC is having problems when it comes to financing their upcoming convention. One can't help but notice the parallels between money mismanagement for the convention and for the nation. The problems the Democrats are facing in bringing the convention together range in size from very large (they are $6 million OVER budget for their renovation of the interior of the Denver Pepsi Center) to the ridiculously simple, such as attracting caterers for the Convention, due to budget problems and some very interesting food requirements that are sending prospective caterers walking away saying, in effect, "thanks for considering us, but hell no."

The convention is being organized by the Democratic National Committee, which is run by Howard Dean, with his chief of staff, the Rev. Leah D. Daughtry, leading the effort. Only in the last month has the Obama campaign been able to take over management of the convention planning with the candidate claiming the nomination, and his aides are increasingly frustrated, as the event nears, at organizers who they believe spent too freely, planned too slowly and underestimated actual costs.

The Obama campaign has dispatched 10 people to Denver to help “get a handle on the budget and make hard decisions” about what has to be done and how to move forward, said Bill Burton, a campaign spokesman.

With Democrats seeking to use the convention to move past the bitterness of their bruising primary fight, the gathering in Denver Aug. 25-28 is likely to draw intense interest as the Obama forces try to show a once-divided party rallying around the nominee. And their convention comes a week before the Minneapolis gathering of the Republicans, whose convention efforts have been much smoother.


The list of financial missteps in planning the convention under the leadership of "Screaming" Howard Dean include the rental of a number of top-end office spaces in Denver, rather than choosing less expensive spacing, and then determining that only half the space that was rented was actually needed, at a cost of $100,000 a month, and filling those offices with rented furniture and office equipment at a cost of $50,000 per month. On top of that, campaign organizers informed their potential donors that donations would not be tax deductible, causing many would-be donors to close their wallets and check books, instead of ensuring that the tax-deductible status was pending and donors would be informed when they could claim the deductions on their taxes.

The next in a long series of mis-steps is the convention's plan to be "green," a program that only three states have signed on to in expected participation. There is still controversy over how to handle protesters outside the Pepsi Center during the convention, with plans currently to locate them possibly next to the media tent (probably not the best strategic move, giving the media full and open access to all protestations).

Perhaps one of the more significant and telling of the list of faux pas made by the DNC in planning events is in regards to how to feed the mass influx of people planning to attend the convention. Given the complex and stringent requirements for the convention in regards to the food to be served, one has to wonder if planners weren't intending to "cater" to Nancy Pelosi.

And then there is the food: A 28-page contract requested by Denver organizers that caterers provide food in “at least three of the following five colors: red, green, yellow, blue/purple and white.” Garnishes could not be counted toward the colors. No fried foods would be allowed. Organic and locally grown foods were mandated, and each plate had to be 50 percent fruits and vegetables. As a result, caterers are shying away.


Despite all of this (and more), Denver DNC Committe spokeswoman Natalie Wyeth claims that the planning for the convention “is on track and we are confident that we are where we are supposed to be at this point in the game. We are exactly where we intended to be at.” The party intended to be $11 million short of the projected $40.6 million needed, a figure which does not include over-budget costs, at this point? And with no food vendors slated and under contract at this point? It would appear, given the sliding of Obama's support within the Democratic party and his string of flip-flops in recent weeks, a poorly planned and thrown together at the last minute with what's left available convention is exactly what the Democrat's do not need if they expect to gain steam for candidate Obama.
article:257004:15::0
5 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #1
    lmao

    I'll cater for them. They will eat what I make too, else go hungry.
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #2
    @ Samantha A. Torrence
    lmao

    I'll cater for them. They will eat what I make too, else go hungry.


    LOL! I like that attitude. If they cannot handle balancing their budget for a simple convention, how on earth do they propose that the country trust them to handle the economy. This is just funny at this point in a sad sort of way.
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  RCB2875
    #3
    The budget.. the Senate restaurant.. The DNC Convention,,
    I will say it again.. A democratic nation is taken directly from the scripts of Idiocracy.
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #4
    That movie is so funny, and was going to be true until us smart wonderful people decided to start breeding more to save the world. *cheeky grin*
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  RCB2875
    #5
    I hope you plan on home schooling them or have a good strategy in place to fight off the Borg assimilation process.. aka public school systems. I have been lucky so far. I bring my kids to a public school that is smaller and out of the district but isn't infested yet. =)
  • Jedediah Redman Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Jedediah Redman
    #6
    Homeschooling will ensure the ignorance are passed on to your children...
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  RCB2875
    #7
    @ Jedediah Redman
    Homeschooling will ensure the ignorance are passed on to your children...

    Jed we know what happened to you besides that nasty fall from the crib you suffered after you hatched.
    Stay out of grown folks conversations will ya..
    In the immortal words of Foghorn Leghorn..
    I say.. Go Away Boy You Bother Me!
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #8
    @ RCB2875
    I hope you plan on home schooling them or have a good strategy in place to fight off the Borg assimilation process.. aka public school systems. I have been lucky so far. I bring my kids to a public school that is smaller and out of the district but isn't infested yet. =)

    Raising them well to have strong convictions and teaching them that if someone asks them to beleive another way that they will gather thier own information before laping at thier feet. By teaching my children not to allow others to intimidate them, to never swing first but always swing last whether it be physically or verbally. And if they want to be homeschooled, so be it. Seriously homeschooled children have been shown to be more learned than other children thier age.
  • Jedediah Redman Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Jedediah Redman
    #9
    Shown by whom?
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  RCB2875
    #10
    Home school students did quite well in 1998 on the ACT college entrance examination. They had an average ACT composite score of 22.8 which is .38 standard deviations above the national ACT average of 21.0 (ACT,1998).This places the average home school student in the 65th percentile of all ACT test takers.”

    “The superior performance of home school students on achievement tests can easily be misinterpreted. This study does not demonstrate that home schooling is superior to public or private schools. It should not be cited as evidence that our public schools are failing. It does not indicate that children will perform better academically if they are home schooled. The design of this study and the data do not warrant such claims. All the comparisons of home school students with the general population and with the private school population in this report fail to consider a myriad of differences between home school and public school students. We have no information as to what the achievement levels of home school students would be had they been enrolled in public or private schools. This study only shows that a large group of parents choosing to make a commitment to home schooling were able to provide a very successful academic environment.”

    Link
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  RCB2875
    #11
    "Even the Unites States Department of Education agrees. In one study which they sponsored themselves home schooled students produced exceptionally high test scores. The median scores in every grade were far higher than those of public schools and even higher than those of private school students. The average home schooled student in grades one through four was a grade level above that of public school peers and, by the time home schooled students reached the equivalent of the 8th grade, they were as much as four years ahead of students attending public school."
    Link

    Really we could go on for ever on this with the same results..
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #12
    But isn't it true that even if children are home schooled, they must still at the very least follow the same academic curriculum as students attending regular schools?
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  RCB2875
    #13
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    But isn't it true that even if children are home schooled, they must still at the very least follow the same academic curriculum as students attending regular schools?

    It depends on the state. They all vary. only 37 states have regulations for home schooling though.
    Link
    Just a little tid bit for jed =)
    the ignorance of rural parents who did not see the value of education. However, it is interesting to note that adult illiteracy rates in 1840 Massachusetts were a low 2% and that, by 1995, this figure had risen to 19%, in spite of apparently enormous advances in the intervening years. In 1840 libraries were rare and today they are everywhere as books are both relatively inexpensive and easy to trade.
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #14
    States with the highest regulations may be the most troublesome to parents contemplating homeschooling. These states general requirements for homeschooling stipulate parents have to send notification or achievement test scores, provide professional evaluations of student progress as well as provide a written curriculum that needs to be approved by the state, teacher qualification of the parents and on some occasions visits by state officials to check the student's progress. These states include Washington, Utah, North Dakota, Minnesota, West Virginia, Pennsylvania, New York, Vermont, Maine, Rhode Island and Massachusetts. These states have few requirements for the Kindergarten level but the regulations become stricter at each subsequent grade level.


    This is the part I was talking about, since we have people here locally (in NY) that home school. I knew it had to be tough, but didn't realize how tough. Apparently though, it is obtainable, as one of our neighbors is home schooling quite a brood of children of all ages!
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  KJ (momentsintime)
    #15
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    But isn't it true that even if children are home schooled, they must still at the very least follow the same academic curriculum as students attending regular schools?


    That's not true Deb.
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  KJ (momentsintime)
    #16
    Each and every type of education has its pros and cons. Homeschooling can be wonderful and it can be a horrible thing depending like any school experience on the teacher.

    What I found with my boys was the joy of learning and being able to learn what motivated them at that time instead of waiting for it to appear in the curriculum.
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #17
    @ KJ (momentsintime)
    Each and every type of education has its pros and cons. Homeschooling can be wonderful and it can be a horrible thing depending like any school experience on the teacher.

    What I found with my boys was the joy of learning and being able to learn what motivated them at that time instead of waiting for it to appear in the curriculum.


    Did you home school them in the states or in Canada, KJ?
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #18
    @ Jedediah Redman
    Homeschooling will ensure the ignorance are passed on to your children...


    Home schooled kids are so ignorant it seems pathetic.

    Lets look at three of my "ignorant" home schooled grandchildren.
    They were all in Junior College by the age of 15. Then two of them on to a university.

    The third and youngest now 18 will be graduating from a culinary arts program next year. She was the youngest that was ever allowed into the program at that school.
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  KJ (momentsintime)
    #19
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    Did you home school them in the states or in Canada, KJ?


    In Florida and West Virginia. The youngest is in PS here. The oldest graduated from homeschooling. Trying to convince him to comment here.
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  KJ (momentsintime)
    #20
    The oldest is being shy tonight but he's one to be proud of. His songwriting skills are already getting acclaim at the age of 21. He taught himself how to play several musical instruments and from that to teach others how to play.

    He has been compared to a young Bob Dylan in that his lyrics are beautiful poetry.

    "She was born in the subways
    By Lake Shore and Queens Quay
    She was raised on the good traits
    And she acts like it's Sunday everyday" The Mass Appeal

    "We've been pulling up blue skies out in the park
    We've been climbing through quicksand to push things along
    We've been diving through smoke screens and firewalls
    But we've been coming 'round lately to hope you drown"
    Split Airwaves


    Although the youngest has some learning disabilities he is in the gifted program.
    They both love to learn. The youngest is teaching himself Japanese.

    I know what pride of a child is because of my boys. I was honoured to teach them for a time.
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #21
    @ KJ (momentsintime)
    I know what pride of a child is because of my boys. I was honoured to teach them for a time.


    Yeah KJ home schooled kids are really ignorant aren't they?

    Seems like some people should keep their mouth shut when they don't know what they are talking about.
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  KJ (momentsintime)
    #22
    @ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    Yeah KJ home schooled kids are really ignorant aren't they?

    Seems like some people should keep their mouth shut when they don't know what they are talking about.



    The thing is all children have a talent. All children are masters of their own minds. It's just being able to help their achieve those beautiful dreams and hang on to the wonder of learning.
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  KJ (momentsintime)
    #23
    Mr Garibaldi I hope you don't mind the change in direction to your article. You done good. :)
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #24
    Whoops along with KJ I agree you done good.

    I took the wrong direction because it kinda ticked me off when someone here commented that
    "Homeschooling will ensure the ignorance are passed on to your children..."

    Well I didn't and don't agree with that statement.

    But anyway this isn't the first time I have done this to you is it? Sheepish grin.
  • Lynn Ellingwood Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Lynn Ellingwood
    #25
    I'm not sure how the discussion went into home schooling but I'm going to be protesting at the convention. I'd like to be by the press box! The whole thing is disgusting and the mess with the Democratic Party continues!
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  RCB2875
    #26
    Be sure to fill us in on all the details that the MSM won't dare touch. =)
  • avatar Posted Jul 6, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #27
    @ KJ (momentsintime)
    In Florida and West Virginia. The youngest is in PS here. The oldest graduated from homeschooling. Trying to convince him to comment here.


    Wow, KJ...I'm impressed! And Cynthia...I didn't know that your children were also home schooled!

    @ Lynn...please do keep us informed!
  • avatar Posted Jul 6, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #28
    @ Lynn Ellingwood
    I'm not sure how the discussion went into home schooling but I'm going to be protesting at the convention. I'd like to be by the press box! The whole thing is disgusting and the mess with the Democratic Party continues!

    Are you concerned about the tension and that it could possibly stop being a protest and perhaps lead to violence?
  • avatar Posted Jul 6, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #29
    Samantha, re-created 68 is going to be there with the sole intention, as the name of tgheir group shows, to re-create the massive chaotic protests that happened at the 1968 Democratic convention.

    The authorities have already fenced of an area which is supposed to keep the protesters well away from the politicians and the anti-war groups, code pink and World can't wait, with others are supposed to be there too protesting.

    The re-create 68 group is convinced the "powers that be" will be using the "Brown Note" on them, even though that has been shown to be a myth.

    If you check out there site, you will see they are providing materials showing how to disrupt the whole affair and what to do if arrested.

    I would be willing to bet that the security at the Convention, between the police and the Secret Service is going to be so tight some butts will be clenching to prevent an actual riot.

    Might be worth the ticket or gas to witness this first hand.
  • avatar Posted Jul 6, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #30
    Some groups have even split away from the re-create 68 group, due to disagreements over tactics.

    More here.

    This should be interesting to say the least.
  • avatar Posted Jul 7, 2008 by  Julybug
    #31
    1st. interesting article. I confess I haven't paid much attention to all the pre-election campaigning...after Hilary dropped out, I've almost lost all interest whatsoever. But this was a very informative article. Nicely written.

    2nd. I just wanted to comment on the ever-popular "ignorant home schooling theme"...I was home schooled in High school. I actually finished after my junior year and had started taking classes at the local community college my sophomore year, in addition to my full high school curriculum. My Junior year I continued my full schedule of high school work and upped my college courses to 12 credits per semester. Needless to say, I was VERY busy that year.

    There are definitely pros and cons to being home schooled, as there are to a private school (which I attended K-8th grade), and public schools. I don't know much about the public school system because I've never experienced it, besides public college/university. Being home schooled definitely takes a certain dedication and self motivation. That's not to say that public/private school kids don't have the same motivation, but I know that it stretched me to change my natural tendencies to be self motivated - especially since I didn't have a teacher checking up on me on a daily basis. My father made up my curriculum, based on what the State requires for a high school diploma, and I worked almost non-stop for 3 years to complete high school early. (both a pro AND con for home schooling...you can do it anywhere) Also, being home schooled was nice for my family because my brother was on a travel hockey team, and my parents like to vacation, so we were not locked into a regular school's scheduling (until we went to college).

    @ Jedediah Redman
    Homeschooling will ensure the ignorance are passed on to your children...


    If by this statement he meant that parents' will pass on their own spiritual/political beliefs and theories, and the children will have no other way (outside influences) to develop their own way of thinking by hearing other's opinions and having different ideals to compare to their taught beliefs, then yes, it is very possible for the home schooled children to grow up in ignorance. It is very possible for sheltered children to be ignorant of other cultures, races, spiritual and political beliefs. And it is a shame if a parent does not at least introduce the ideas of others into their children's lives. And unfortunately this happens to more people than just those who are home schooled.

    However, if a child is home schooled and taught to appreciate the differences in others, and is introduced to other cultures/beliefs (political & spiritual), then by all means, let the parents home school their children.

    It is a HUGE undertaking to home school one's children. It is not a decision that is made lightly or on a whim. It requires dedication from both parent and child, time, patience, and endurance. Being home schooled was hard. It was hard on me, my brother, sister, mom and dad. Everyone felt the stress of it every once in a while.

    If I could do it all over again, I honestly don't know what I'd pick. I like where my life's at right now. I'm getting married in 12 days, I had a great college/high school experience, and life is what you make it. I don't know where I'd be at in life if I had continued in my former private school or had gone to public school. I had a lot of friends in high school - ones from my old private school and ones from church. I also met people when I went to the junior college. I think it would have been fun to run for student council or go to school dances or play varsity sports, but I think I still had a good high school experience. (I did play AAU volleyball - travel team)

    I would not consider myself ignorant. I learned from my parents' (as any child would), and chose to adapt many of their beliefs because I wanted to, not because it was all I ever knew about.

    aaaand that's my two cents on the matter. :-)
  • avatar Posted Jul 7, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #32
    @ Julybug
    1st. interesting article. I confess I haven't paid much attention to all the pre-election campaigning...after Hilary dropped out, I've almost lost all interest whatsoever. But this was a very informative article. Nicely written.

    2nd. I just wanted to comment on the ever-popular "ignorant home schooling theme"...I was home schooled in High school. I actually finished after my junior year and had started taking classes at the local community college my sophomore year, in addition to my full high school curriculum. My Junior year I continued my full schedule of high school work and upped my college courses to 12 credits per semester. Needless to say, I was VERY busy that year.

    There are definitely pros and cons to being home schooled, as there are to a private school (which I attended K-8th grade), and public schools. I don't know much about the public school system because I've never experienced it, besides public college/university. Being home schooled definitely takes a certain dedication and self motivation. That's not to say that public/private school kids don't have the same motivation, but I know that it stretched me to change my natural tendencies to be self motivated - especially since I didn't have a teacher checking up on me on a daily basis. My father made up my curriculum, based on what the State requires for a high school diploma, and I worked almost non-stop for 3 years to complete high school early. (both a pro AND con for home schooling...you can do it anywhere) Also, being home schooled was nice for my family because my brother was on a travel hockey team, and my parents like to vacation, so we were not locked into a regular school's scheduling (until we went to college).

    If by this statement he meant that parents' will pass on their own spiritual/political beliefs and theories, and the children will have no other way (outside influences) to develop their own way of thinking by hearing other's opinions and having different ideals to compare to their taught beliefs, then yes, it is very possible for the home schooled children to grow up in ignorance. It is very possible for sheltered children to be ignorant of other cultures, races, spiritual and political beliefs. And it is a shame if a parent does not at least introduce the ideas of others into their children's lives. And unfortunately this happens to more people than just those who are home schooled.

    However, if a child is home schooled and taught to appreciate the differences in others, and is introduced to other cultures/beliefs (political & spiritual), then by all means, let the parents home school their children.

    It is a HUGE undertaking to home school one's children. It is not a decision that is made lightly or on a whim. It requires dedication from both parent and child, time, patience, and endurance. Being home schooled was hard. It was hard on me, my brother, sister, mom and dad. Everyone felt the stress of it every once in a while.

    If I could do it all over again, I honestly don't know what I'd pick. I like where my life's at right now. I'm getting married in 12 days, I had a great college/high school experience, and life is what you make it. I don't know where I'd be at in life if I had continued in my former private school or had gone to public school. I had a lot of friends in high school - ones from my old private school and ones from church. I also met people when I went to the junior college. I think it would have been fun to run for student council or go to school dances or play varsity sports, but I think I still had a good high school experience. (I did play AAU volleyball - travel team)

    I would not consider myself ignorant. I learned from my parents' (as any child would), and chose to adapt many of their beliefs because I wanted to, not because it was all I ever knew about.

    aaaand that's my two cents on the matter. :-)


    Your two cents are always a worthy read.
  • avatar Posted Jul 7, 2008 by  Julybug
    #33
    @ Sue D.
    Your two cents are always a worthy read.


    Thanks Sue! I like commenting. If only I could find some subjects that sparked my interest enough to write about, then I'd submit an article to be a journalist. I love to write. :-)
  • avatar Posted Jul 7, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #34
    @ KJ (momentsintime)
    Mr Garibaldi I hope you don't mind the change in direction to your article. You done good. :)


    No problem, darlin, I'm a huge supporter of home schooling, especially after having taught in the public education(less) system.
  • avatar Posted Jul 7, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #35
    @ Julybug
    Thanks Sue! I like commenting. If only I could find some subjects that sparked my interest enough to write about, then I'd submit an article to be a journalist. I love to write. :-)


    Since you were home schooled it was good to hear your comments on it.

    You write well Julybug so hopefully one day you will find something to write on so you can submit it.

    Congratulations on your upcoming wedding. I wish you both a good long happy life. :)

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?