The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageU.S. Army Deserter May Have Valid refugee Claim

Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Bob Ewing in Politics | 12 comments | 406 views
Next in Politics
Related News
Advertising
Canadian Federal Court Justice Robert Barnes said Canada's refugee board erred by rejecting the asylum bid of Joshua Key.
An American war deserter could have a valid claim for refugee status in Canada, the Federal Court ruled on Friday.

The recent decision by Canadian Federal Court Justice Robert Barnes may have an effect on future refuges claims. Barnes said that Canada's refugee board erred by rejecting the asylum bid of Joshua Key . Barnes has ordered that a new panel reconsider the application.

In 2003, Key was in Iraq, for eight months, serving as a combat engineer , while there he claims that he was responsible for nighttime raids on private Iraqi homes, which included searching for weapons.

In addition, while in Iraq witnessed several cases of abuse, humiliation, and looting by the U.S. army.

Key back home on a two week leave was experiencing nightmares and did not want to go back. he consulted with a military lawyer who told him that he had two choices, either return to Iraq or face prison.

Key took a third option and left for Canada with his family where he applied for refugee status.

The immigration board arrived at the conclusion that some of the alleged conduct by the U.S military included a "disturbing level of brutality," however, it said the conduct did not meet the definition of a war crime or a crime against humanity.

Barnes stated that the board was incorrect because “by concluding that refugee protection for military deserters and evaders is only available where the conduct objected to amounts to a war crime, a crime against peace or a crime against humanity."

Barnes cited a case from the U.S. Federal Court of Appeal, and said officially condoned military misconduct could still support a refugee claim, even if it falls short of a war crime.

"The authorities indicate that military action which systematically degrades, abuses or humiliates either combatants or non-combatants is capable of supporting a refugee claim where that is the proven reason for refusing to serve," Barnes wrote.

The board imposed a legal standard that was "too restrictive" on Key.

Jeffry House is Key's lawyer and he said the ruling expands a soldier's right to refuse military service.

"It's a huge victory for numerous soldiers who are here and maybe others who are thinking of coming here," House said.

The court decision is under review by Canadian immigration.
article:256989:16::0
4 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #1
    I'm not really sure how I feel about his, although I will say that if he wasn't mentally or emotionally able to return to the war, then had he, he'd have put the rest of his troup in danger.
  • Jim  Reed Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Jim Reed
    #2
    This is a step forward in the struggle against illegal warfare. The random invasion of homes and harrassing of innocent civilians is as close to war crimes as you can get...it borders on "collective punishment" which IS a war crime.

    I agree with Judge Barnes...who...by the way...is a military tribunal judge as well.

    But apart from all the arguments in court...the fact is, the war in Iraq has no basis in law. It was the result of the Bush administration "planning and waging an aggressive war". That's what the Nazi leaders were tried for and hung for at Nuremberg.

    I'm quite sure that Judge Barnes had that knowledge in the back of his mind as he reached his decision.
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  lensman67
    #3
    Run away suicide rates, drug abuse, clinical depression and desertion. Bush's crackpot crusade has brought all this down on our service personnel and has done more to destroy America's military effectiveness than any enemy could ever hope to do.

    It is good that Canada may return to the policy of giving refuge to those who have seen the immorality of Bush's wars and want no part of them.
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #4
    I'm with Deb as I am really not sure how I feel about this whole "war."
    Is it just a power struggle to control the oil? Is it some rich men's desires to grab what they can at the expense of innocent people's lives?

    Our military do not receive the help that they should. They are used and thrown on the garbage heap when they come home broken physically, mentally and spiritually.

    How many are homeless because they turned to drugs and drinking because they cannot cope with what they have gone through?

    Good report Bob and maybe Canada is doing the right thing to give these men and women asylum.
  • avatar Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #5
    How many are homeless because they turned to drugs and drinking because they cannot cope with what they have gone through?
    very solid questions.
  • Jedediah Redman Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Jedediah Redman
    #6
    @ Jim Reed
    This is a step forward in the struggle against illegal warfare. The random invasion of homes and harrassing of innocent civilians is as close to war crimes as you can get...it borders on "collective punishment" which IS a war crime.

    I agree with Judge Barnes...who...by the way...is a military tribunal judge as well.

    But apart from all the arguments in court...the fact is, the war in Iraq has no basis in law. It was the result of the Bush administration "planning and waging an aggressive war". That's what the Nazi leaders were tried for and hung for at Nuremberg.

    I'm quite sure that Judge Barnes had that knowledge in the back of his mind as he reached his decision.


    Nice to read a post by somebody from the saner side...
  • Jedediah Redman Posted Jul 5, 2008 by  Jedediah Redman
    #7
    @ lensman67
    Run away suicide rates, drug abuse, clinical depression and desertion. Bush's crackpot crusade has brought all this down on our service personnel and has done more to destroy America's military effectiveness than any enemy could ever hope to do.

    It is good that Canada may return to the policy of giving refuge to those who have seen the immorality of Bush's wars and want no part of them.


    Except its just about five years too late...
  • avatar Posted Jul 6, 2008 by  Sheba
    #8
    Thanks for this update Bob! And now is as good a time as any to remind myself of why I am so very proud to be a Canadian Citizen!
  • avatar Posted Jul 6, 2008 by  Dave G. (TruthMan)
    #9
    Key should be granted asylum in Canada.
  • Jim  Reed Posted Jul 6, 2008 by  Jim Reed
    #10
    Dave G. (TruthMan) Key should be granted asylum in Canada.

    Definitely!
  • avatar Posted Jul 6, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #11
    @ Sheba
    Thanks for this update Bob! And now is as good a time as any to remind myself of why I am so very proud to be a Canadian Citizen!

    It is a solid reason to feel respect for Canada.
  • laurel dick Posted Jul 7, 2008 by  laurel dick
    #12
    For people who cannot get into Canada:

    http://ivaw.org/membership

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?