The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageStudy Says Agriculture Leading Culprit Behind Frog Sexual Abnormalities

Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Bob Ewing in Environment | 7 comments | 333 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
In a study over whether agricultural chemicals pose a threat to amphibians, UF zoologists have found that toads in suburban areas are less likely to suffer from reproductive system abnormalities than toads near farms.
University of Florida (UF) zoologists have completed a study that settles a long standing debate over whether agricultural chemicals pose a threat to amphibians.

The zoologists have found that toads in suburban areas are less likely to suffer from reproductive system abnormalities than toads near farms where some had both testes and ovaries.

“As you increase agriculture,” said Lou Guillette, a distinguished professor of zoology, “you have an increasing number of abnormalities.”

Guillette is one of several UF authors of a paper on the research that appears in the online version of the journal Environmental Health Perspectives. The lead author is Krista McCoy, who did the work as part of her UF School of Natural Resources and the Environment dissertation.

Previous studies have suggested a link between herbicides commonly used in farming and sexual abnormalities in tadpoles and frogs. Such deformities may be responsible for declines in frogs documented in areas affected by agricultural contaminants, such as Sierra Nevada, Calif.

Amphibians are declining worldwide and agricultural chemicals are considered to be one likely cause; others include pathogenic infections and habitat loss.

In the past, research has compared frogs that were collected from natural areas with those collected from agricultural areas. Other projects focused on specific chemicals, including the herbicide Atrazine, as causing abnormalities.

The UF study is the first peer-reviewed study to compare abnormalities in wild toads; toads are a variety of frogs, from heavily farmed areas with frogs from both partially farmed and completely suburban areas. The study, thus, highlights the difference between the impacts of agriculture versus development.

“Our study is the first to explicitly ask, of these two areas of human disturbance, do we see a greater proportion of abnormal animals in one versus another?” Guillette said.

The results implicate agriculture and this means that future research can narrow the focus to agricultural chemicals.

“Because we know what chemicals are used at these agricultural sites, we can begin to pin down the chemical cause of these abnormalities by conducting controlled experiments with each chemical alone and in combination,” she said.

Giant toads, known scientifically as Bufo marinus, were gathered from five sites stretching from Lake Worth to Belle Glade and down to Homestead in South Florida. Bufo marinus is a very large, exotic, invasive, species known to be deadly to small animals.

The researchers studied the toad in part because they are easy to catch and their large size ensures enough blood for analysis. Also, Guillette said, “they are common in other agricultural areas around the world,” which means they are a good generalist species.

One of the sites consisted almost entirely of land devoted to sugar cane or vegetable farms. The amount of farmland declined in three other sites, with the last being entirely suburban. Google Earth images were used to calculate the amount of farmland in each site.

Each site was 2.1 square miles, with the toads collected at the center, because the toad’s home range is known to be about 1.2 miles, and the researchers sought only those toads living entirely within each site. At least 20 toads were collected from each site in 2005 and 2006.

A pattern was found when the euthanized toads were examined: the more agricultural the land where the toads lived, the more sexual organ abnormalities or so-called “intersex” toads — toads who have both female and male internal reproductive organs which is not a normal condition for this and most species of amphibians.

Normal male toads’ forelimbs are thicker and stronger than those of their female counterparts; however, more of the intersex frogs only found in agricultural areas had thin, weak forearms.

In addition, intersexes had fewer “nuptial pads,” areas of scrappy skin on their feet used to grip females during copulation.

Where a sex was clear, the male toads appeared by far the most affected. Normal males are brown, while females are mottled with brown stripes. However, males from agricultural areas were mottled, looking like females.

The more agricultural the sites, the more feminized the males’ reproductive organs were and many had both ovaries and testes. Both the impacted males and the intersex frogs had less of the male hormone testosterone than normal males, suggesting diminished reproductive capabilities.

The study’s results may have important implications not only for other wild species, but also for people.

“What we are finding in Bufo marinus might also occur in other animals, including other amphibian species and humans,” McCoy said. “In fact, reproductive abnormalities are increasing in humans and these increases could partially be due to exposure to pesticides.”

The paper’s other authors are Colette St. Mary, a UF associate professor of zoology; Heather Hamlin, a postdoctoral associate; and Lauriel Bortnick and Chelsey Campbell, who both worked on the study as UF undergraduates.

Industrial agriculture can affect the sexual organs of toads what is it doing to you?
article:256948:11::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Chris V. (cgull)
    #1
    Maybe it will make sterile humans in the future and that might be one of the reasons for the extinction.
  • avatar Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #2
    @ Chris V. (cgull)
    Maybe it will make sterile humans in the future and that might be one of the reasons for the extinction.

    interesting speculation, could make a good movie.
  • avatar Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #3
    When the different chemicals affect any creature I always think what effect does it have on humans and other creatures.
  • avatar Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #4
    @ Bob Ewing
    interesting speculation, could make a good movie.


    Or a good novel!



    @ Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    When the different chemicals affect any creature I always think what effect does it have on humans and other creatures.


    I think the same thing. If it affects the wildlife...then sooner or later, it will create similar problems for humans. As Bob has often said: you are what you eat.
  • avatar Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #5
    It all enters the food chain at some point and will eventually end up in us.
  • avatar Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Debra Myers (skyangel)
    #6
    @ Bob Ewing
    It all enters the food chain at some point and will eventually end up in us.


    See---I remembered your previous comment! LOL!
  • avatar Posted Jul 4, 2008 by  Bob Ewing
    #7
    @ Debra Myers (skyangel)
    See---I remembered your previous comment! LOL!

    I noticed. :)

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?