The Power of Citizen Journalism
Post News ($)»     Post Blog»     Upload Image»     Groups»     Events»     Alerts»     How do I ...»
Email Print Share

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional

article imageObama, Clinton, McCain and Barr? The Libertarian Presidential Candidate

Posted May 25, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence in Politics | 14 comments | 576 views
Next in Politics
Related News
Advertising
With all the attention on the front runners for the Democrat and Republican parties, few know that there are other choices. The Libertarian Party has picked their nominee for Presidential Candidate.
The libertarian party is a little talked of party in the United States. Small and rather grassroots it barely receives mention from the Mainstream Media. However, with all the strife in the news over Presidential candidates it seems one important fact has been overlooked; You do not have to choose Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, or even John McCain. There are other choices and one of those is Former Rep. Bob Barr. The Libertarian party selected Rep. Barr as the party's Presidential nominee over Mary Ruwarts 54 per cent to 46 per cent.

Barr was a former member of the GOP and became notable during the Bill Clinton Impeachment trials. Rep. Barr's campaign began mid-May 2008 and after a short run was victorious in grasping the Libertarian nomination. His stances on the issues have changed as well as his party Affiliation. He shares initial stances of small government with the Libertarian Party as well as the end of federal income tax, abolishment of the IRS and a strong support of the second amendment. He has been a strong opponent of legalized abortion which did not fall in line with the Libertarian platform which favors no restriction of reproductive rights. He was also an opponent of the legalization of medical Marijuana but has since changed his stance to follow the Libertarian platform which seeks to repeal "laws establishing criminal or civil penalties for the use of drugs."

Rep. Bob Barr has been hailed one of the strongest libertarian candidates in the 37 year history of the Libertarian party, and it is hoped he will spread the Libertarian message past the 28 states that allow the party's delegates on their primary ballots. Another notable Libertarian who is currently seeking the Republican nod is Rep. Ron Paul.

On his campaign website, Bob Barr explains the issues of his platform with the straight forward tone that is common among Libertarian leaders.

Government Spending

* Repeal the 16th Amendment to no longer authorize Congress to levy taxes.
* Cut over all government spending, not just wasteful earmarks.
* Get rid of entitlement programs, especially those that aid the wealthy and corporations
* Replace income tax with a national sales tax.

Individual Liberties and the Constitution

* Battle the Nanny state by restoring individual liberties
* Insuring the Constitution is followed as originally intended
* Secure the 4th Amendment for everyone
* Emphasize personal responsibility for all decisions good or bad

The United States was created for the purpose of securing the liberties of its people. The colonists fled oppressive old world governments. The nation’s founders drafted the Constitution to sharply limit the federal government’s powers. The horrors perpetrated by the many collectivist tyrannies of the 20th Century demonstrate that the danger of government, any government, violating individual liberty is greater today than when America was founded.


Secure Borders

* Aggressively secure the borders
* Confront pandering politicians who allow illegal immigrants to abuse American Tax Dollars

"Our borders are currently neither open, closed, nor secure. This situation restricts the labor pool, encouraging employers to hire undocumented workers, while leaving those workers neither subject to nor protected by the law. A completely open border allows foreign criminals, carriers of communicable diseases, terrorists and other potential threats to enter the country unchecked. Pandering politicians guarantee access to public services for undocumented aliens, to the detriment of those who would enter to work productively, and increasing the burden on taxpayers."


National Defense

* Once again become the Sleeping Giant that will attack only when attacked
* Do not strike with speculative intelligence

The proper use of force is clear. If attacked, the aggressor will experience firsthand the skillful wrath of the American fighting man. However, invading or initiating force against another nation based upon perceived threats and speculative intelligence is simply un-American. We are better than the policy of pre-emptive warfare.



For information on the Libertarian Party go to the Party website available here.
article:255178:18::0
3 subscribers
Subscribe To This Thread[?] :
  • avatar Posted May 25, 2008 by  RCB2875
    #1
    I haven't done much research on Bob Barr but I heard an interview Glenn Beck had with him. He sounds like he might have better qualities than the choices we have now. But I am reluctant to say much more than that at the moment.
  • avatar Posted May 25, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #2
    I haven't even heard of him till today. Worth the look. A small government kind of guy might be what we need to balance America out.
  • avatar Posted May 25, 2008 by  RCB2875
    #3
    @ Samantha A. Torrence
    I haven't even heard of him till today. Worth the look. A small government kind of guy might be what we need to balance America out.

    Me too. One thing is sure there is alot of headroom for improvement over the present Rep./Dem. choices.
  • avatar Posted May 25, 2008 by  Samantha A. Torrence
    #4
    lol yuppers I can second that.
  • avatar Posted May 25, 2008 by  Mr Garibaldi
    #5
    @ RCB2875
    I haven't done much research on Bob Barr but I heard an interview Glenn Beck had with him. He sounds like he might have better qualities than the choices we have now. But I am reluctant to say much more than that at the moment.


    I caught that interview on the radio. Guy sounds like he's got his head on his shoulders instead of...well, being inverted..........
  • avatar Posted May 25, 2008 by  RCB2875
    #6
    @ Mr Garibaldi
    I caught that interview on the radio. Guy sounds like he's got his head on his shoulders instead of...well, being inverted..........

    From what little bit I was able to determine from the interview I would agree to that.

    My only concern is knowing that the MoonBatts will vote to the extreme left. Will this become a double edged sword for the rest of us? How much of the Rep party or rather conservative minded people be split between McCain and Barr.
    That could have disastrous consequences.
  • avatar Posted May 26, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #7
    Barr Calls for "immediate plans" to draw down Troops in Iraq.

    Barr: We Rush To War With Iran At Our Own Peril

    Barr Interview on Anti-war radio

    Barr Agrees with Ca. Supreme Court on Gay Marriage Ruling

    Barr supports some form of amnesty

    Barr: Immigration Indigestion
    Said Barr:

    “You set a mechanism internally to determine who is here. And if you catch folks that are here unlawfully, and do not submit themselves to a background check that those coming into this country are going to be required to do, then you send them back to their country.”

    Said Boortz:

    “It sounds to me that you’re saying, if you find an illegal immigrant in this country, and they’re willing to submit to a background check, that that could open the door to them staying here.”

    Said Barr:

    “I think as a practical matter, that makes a lot of sense. I’m not sure how you would go about rounding up millions of people and trying to deport them. The key here is security….”


    Barr 2008

    Too close to Ron Paul for my likes.
  • avatar Posted May 26, 2008 by  Michael Billy (TRA)
    #8
    Bob Barr might be a Libertarian, but he is not a libertarian. This is one of the reasons I've stopped paying attention to the Libertarian Party. They're not even a major party and they still manage to stray away from their principles. Shame shame *wags fingers*

    They should have picked Ruwart. I'm fairly appalled by this decision, but I'm not really all that stunned. The LP has been moving farther center every year and for what? Just to gain a half of a percentage point? It's a pathetic development from the "Party of Principle." And too think I was once actually a member.

    Now theres not even a third party for those who believe in small government to vote for. Whats a true conservative to do? I guess I could write in Ruwart, but what kind of difference could that possibly make? Sorry to rant here, but I'm finally starting to get sick of the whole voting "process". Every election seems more and more like a scam.
  • avatar Posted May 26, 2008 by  LewWaters
    #9
    Mike, to me it just shows that we all need to become even more aggressive in grassroots activity to encourage and support conservatives, and ignore the lamestream media that seems to select who we may choose from through their biased coverage and selective polling data.

    Conservatives want nothing to do with McCain, yet they heavily promoted him, enticing others to vote for him. DailyKOS was recommending liberals cross ranks and vote for him.

    Obama has no real qualifications, yet he is carried as their best bet.

    Hillary is ignored now that they heavily promote Obama.

    Some choice!
  • avatar Posted May 26, 2008 by  Michael Billy (TRA)
    #10
    * Battle the Nanny state by restoring individual liberties
    * Insuring the Constitution is followed as originally intended
    * Secure the 4th Amendment for everyone
    * Emphasize personal responsibility for all decisions good or bad

    Ahhh he can say he believes in these things, but his action speak louder. He is an avid supporter of the war on drugs (so much for personal responsibility for all decisions good or bad) and voted for the Patriot Act (so much for the constitution and 4th Amendment). He's just another lying, double-speaking politician. Nothing more, nothing less.
  • avatar Posted May 26, 2008 by  Michael Billy (TRA)
    #11
    @ LewWaters
    Mike, to me it just shows that we all need to become even more aggressive in grassroots activity to encourage and support conservatives, and ignore the lamestream media that seems to select who we may choose from through their biased coverage and selective polling data.

    Conservatives want nothing to do with McCain, yet they heavily promoted him, enticing others to vote for him. DailyKOS was recommending liberals cross ranks and vote for him.

    Obama has no real qualifications, yet he is carried as their best bet.

    Hillary is ignored now that they heavily promote Obama.

    Some choice!


    Honestly, this is one of the most upsetting pieces of news to come out of the LP in years. They picked Barr for the little bit of media attention that he will produce and its really kind of sickening. I'm honestly starting to believe that voting and working inside the system will no longer achieve political change. Civil disobedience from the grassroots might really be the only way to go.

    If only we could get some libertarian (small 'l') media out on the television it might help at least a little.

    Theres a popular campaign sign out there that reads "Ron Paul Cured My Apathy", but this decision from the LP has certainly brought mine back. The LP used to be the home for disenfranchised Republicans, but now where do the disenfranchised Libertarians go?
  • avatar Posted May 26, 2008 by  Sue D.
    #12
    All I will say is REMEMBER NADER.

    For those that do not understand, look him up and the story of how became the 'spoiler" for the Democrats, should be an eye opener.
  • avatar Posted May 26, 2008 by  Dave G. (TruthMan)
    #13
    Barr is a great candidate. He is much better than McCain, Clinton or Obama. Regarding the two critics of Barr who are angry with the Libertarian Party for choosing him, they had a fair election and Ruwart came in second. There is no such thing as a perfect candidate or platform.
  • avatar Posted May 26, 2008 by  Michael Billy (TRA)
    #14
    @ Dave G. (TruthMan)
    Barr is a great candidate. He is much better than McCain, Clinton or Obama. Regarding the two critics of Barr who are angry with the Libertarian Party for choosing him, they had a fair election and Ruwart came in second. There is no such thing as a perfect candidate or platform.

    While he might be better than Clinton, McCain, or Obama he is still far from being a great candidate. And yes, there is such a thing as a perfect candidate and that would be someone who is principled and sticks to those principles. At least a Socialist will admit to wanting to redistribute wealth. Barr, on the other hand, joins the LP (thus agreeing to the Non Agression Axiom), but he still supports the Patriot Act and the War on Drugs. Pretty unprincipled if you ask me.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?