The Power of Citizen Journalism
 
News» Top News» Latest News» Post News ($) Blogs» Top Blogs» Latest Blogs» Post Blog» Images» Top Images» Latest Images» Upload Images» TV» Groups» View Groups» Create a Group» Live Events» Alerts» Create an Alert» Manage Alerts» How do I ...» Get paid to report news» Post blogs» Upload images» Embed video» Join/create groups» Vote on news & images» Comment & debate»
 

article imageSen. Larry Craig Files Papers to Withdraw His Guilty Plea

Posted Sep 10, 2007 by  Michael Billy (TRA) in Politics | 2 comments | 674 views
Join our team to voice opinions, share images, get paid to report news and more!
Email Print Share
Subscribe to author

Email this article

Recipient email:
Your email:
optional
Message:
optional
Idaho lawmaker Larry Craig, who was recently nabbed in a sex sting at a Minneapolis airport bathroom and subsequently pleaded guilty to a disorderly conduct charge relating to the incident, has filed court papers to withdraw his plea.
According to police reports, Craig, a Republican U.S. Senator, solicited sex from an under cover officer in a Minneapolis airport bathroom stall.

Craig admits to moving his foot and reaching his hand down, signs that the undercover officer believed were intended to solicit gay sex.

Craig has said that he regrets his guilty plea because he made the decision hastily and did not consult with an attorney. He blames his mistake on stress caused by media inquiries regarding his sexuality and says he made the plea to put the matter behind him.

The documents
, filed in Hennepin County District Court had a couple of interesting quotes:
"While in this state of intense anxiety, Senator Craig felt compelled to grasp the lifeline offered to him by the police officer; namely, that if he were to submit to an interview and plead guilty, then none of the officer's allegations would be made public."

"Thus, rather than seek legal advice from an attorney to assist him in publicly fighting these charges and potentially protract the issue, Senator Craig's panic drove him to accept a guilty plea, the terms of which offered him what he thought was a private, expeditious resolution of this matter."

Filing the papers is not the biggest hurdle Senator Craig has to get over. In order for the guilty plea to be withdrawn, a judge has to be convinced that there are extraneous circumstances that led to the plea, a task that will not be easy.

Will the excuse of "stress caused from the media" be enough to convince the judge? Or will it require some fancy wordplay from a gifted attorney? Only time will tell.
article:226314:8::0
2 subscribers
Subscribe to this thread
  • avatar Posted Sep 10, 2007 by  Cynthia T. [Picasso]
    #1
    Let's see he was trying to or was playing footsie with the guy in the next stall. Then he reached his hand under the stall for what??

    Then he finds out the guy is an undercover officer in the next stall.

    Then he pleads guilty to disorderly conduct and thinks by pleading guilty it will be kept quiet so no one will find out. Find out what? Now if he did nothing that was illegal what would he be afraid of being made public?

    Now the usual, of course, it was someone else's fault. Oh dear that excuses everything of course.

    It is the media's fault that he made the mistake of pleading guilty.

    These people make me sick they never seem to be able to take the responsibility for THEIR OWN actions.

    He went after the guy in the next stall it wasn't the other way around.
  • avatar Posted Sep 10, 2007 by  S.H. Mills
    #2
    This is such a strange case. It seems to me that if the guy was really guilty, he'd just want to fade away and have his name out of the headlines, which was ostensibly what he attempted to do by accepting the plea (which apparently included a promise not to sully his name).

    He appeared guilty to me at first, but I can't imagine someone dredging all of this back up if he is actually guilty. I also tend to wonder about the veracity of officers when they grab people up and quickly try to get them to plea without assistance of counsel, with the only evidence of any wrongdoing being the word of one officer. If there was such a great case against Craig, why would they offer a plea in the first place?

    I just don't know. Strange.

Add a Comment

You have to Login or Register to comment


Email:
Password:
Remember meForgot password?